There’s a cool little coffee shop near campus called Mugs, and Tuesday morning, I saw this sign over their cash register:

IMG_0953

Thus I of course thought of the following Afternoon Pages prompt:

If a coffee shop has a motto and “words they like,” so should we. We’ve thought a lot about why it’s worth it to teach now. What should our class motto be in this regard? What are the words we like–as in, the words that should ground our thinking as we proceed throughout the semester? 

I can’t make a class motto myself, of course. That’s for these wonderful young educators to do, but I can speak to “words I like,” or one word, to be more precise.

We just read an interview with Paolo Freire from 1985 issue of Language Arts, and one of his words is “love.” He explains that we must “love students, in spite of everything. I don’t mean a kind of soft or sweet love, but on the contrary a very affirmative love, a love which accepts, a love for students which pushes us to go beyond, which makes us more and more responsible for our task.”

I recognize that it’s unfashionable to talk about love when the terms “education” and “global competition” are bedfellows in almost every political conversation, and yet, we must, mustn’t we? We aren’t reluctant to talk about our love of literature or writing or teaching in general, but we teach people, too. Shouldn’t we love them? It’s the only way, really, to push through the hard work we have to do.

On a related note, yesterday, I was listening to a podcast interview between Krista Tippett and neurologist Richard Davidson, where Davidson unequivocally states, “I’m not afraid to speak about love. I think that the way I think about it is that love is a quality which obliterates certain kinds of boundaries.”

What got left out of that cognitivist movement in education, according to Davidson, is attention to the parts of our brain that connect to our emotions and our capacity for empathy, kindness, and yes, love. He explains,

the brain does not honor the kind of anachronistic distinction between thought and feeling. Thought and feeling are absolutely intermingled in the brain, and so there are no areas of the brain that are exclusively dedicated to one and not the other.

So in the end, hard science agrees that Freire is right.

As per Davidson, “Cultivating the qualities which will promote resilience — yes, in some sense it’s soft, but in another sense, you couldn’t get much harder in terms of what really matters.”

So “love.” Perhaps I have a motto after all.

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Advertisements
%d bloggers like this: